Recovery Dynamics and Prognosis After Dialysis for Acute Kidney Injury.

Importance: The interplay among baseline kidney function, severity of acute kidney disease (AKD), and post-AKD kidney function has significant associations with patient outcomes. However, a comprehensive understanding of how these factors are collectively associated with mortality, major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in patients with dialysis-requiring acute kidney injury (AKI-D) is yet to be fully explored. Objective: To investigate the associations of baseline kidney function, AKD severity, and post-AKD kidney function with mortality, MACEs, and ESKD in patients with AKI-D. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nationwide, population-based cohort study of patients with AKI-D was conducted between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2018, using data from various health care settings included in the Taiwan nationwide population-based cohort database. Data analysis was conducted from April 28, 2022, to June 30, 2023. Exposure: Exposure to severe AKI and baseline and post-AKD kidney function. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and incident MACEs, and secondary outcomes were risks of permanent dialysis and readmission. Results: A total of 6703 of 22 232 patients (mean [SD] age, 68.0 [14.7] years; 3846 [57.4%] male) with AKI-D with post-AKD kidney function follow-up and AKD stage data were enrolled. During a mean (SD) 1.2 (0.9) years of follow-up, the all-cause mortality rate was 28.3% (n = 1899), while the incidence rates of MACEs and ESKD were 11.1% (n = 746) and 16.7% (n = 1119), respectively. After adjusting for known covariates, both post-AKD kidney function and baseline kidney function, but not AKD severity, were independently associated with all-cause mortality, MACEs, ESKD, and readmission. Moreover, worse post-AKD kidney function correlated with progressive and significant increases in the risk of adverse outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of patients with AKI-D, more than one-quarter of patients died after 1.2 years of follow-up. Baseline and post-AKD kidney functions serve as important factors associated with the long-term prognosis of patients with AKI-D. Therefore, concerted efforts to understand the transition from post-AKD to chronic kidney disease are crucial.

Impact of SGLT2 inhibitors on patient outcomes: a network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: A comprehensive network meta-analysis comparing the effects of individual sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors on patients with and without comorbidities including diabetes mellitus (DM), heart failure (HF), and chronic kidney disease (CKD) has not been previously conducted. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials up to March 28, 2023. Network meta-analysis using a random-effects model was conducted to calculate risk ratios (RRs). Risk of Bias tool 2.0 was used to assess bias, and CINeMA to assess the certainty of evidence. In the subgroup analysis, the SGLT2 inhibitors were classified into highly (dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, and ertugliflozin) and less selective SGLT2 inhibitors (canagliflozin and sotagliflozin). RESULTS: A total of fourteen trials with 75,334 patients were analyzed. Among these, 40,956 had taken SGLT2 inhibitors and 34,378 had not. One of the main results with particular findings was empagliflozin users had a significantly lower risk of all-cause death compared to dapagliflozin users in DM population (RR: 0.81, 95% CI 0.69-0.96). In HF population, sotagliflozin users had a borderline significantly lower risk of CV death or hospitalization for HF (HHF) than dapagliflozin users (RR: 0.90, 95% CI 0.80-1.01). In non-HF population, those who used canagliflozin had a significantly lower risk of CV death or HHF compared with those who used dapagliflozin (RR: 0.75, 95% CI 0.58-0.98). At last, for HF patients, those who used less selective SGLT2 inhibitors had a significantly lower risk of MACEs compared to those who used highly selective SGLT2 inhibitors (RR: 0.75, 95% CI 0.62-0.90). CONCLUSIONS: Our network meta-analysis revealed that empagliflozin users with diabetes experienced a lower risk of dying from any cause than those using dapagliflozin. Additionally, canagliflozin users demonstrated a reduced risk of cardiovascular death or HHF compared to dapagliflozin users in those without HF. In HF patients, less selective SGLT2 inhibitors showed superior CV composite outcomes, even surpassing the performance of highly selective SGLT2 inhibitors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO [CRD42022361906].

Improvement of composite kidney outcomes by AKI care bundles: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Various approaches have been suggested to identify acute kidney injury (AKI) early and to initiate kidney-protective measures in patients at risk or with AKI. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether care bundles improve kidney outcomes in these patients. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the literature to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of AKI care bundles with or without urinary biomarkers in the recognition and management of AKI. The main outcomes were major adverse kidney events (MAKEs) consisting of moderate-severe AKI, receipt of renal replacement therapy (RRT), and mortality. RESULTS: Out of 7434 abstracts screened, 946 published studies were identified. Thirteen studies [five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and eight non-RCTs] including 16,540 patients were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis showed a lower incidence of MAKE in the AKI care bundle group [odds ratio (OR) 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66-0.81] with differences in all 3 individual outcomes [moderate-severe AKI (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.51-0.82), RRT (OR 0.63, 95% CI = 0.46-0.88) and mortality]. Subgroup analysis of the RCTs, all adopted biomarker-based approach, decreased the risk of MAKE (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.41-0.74). Network meta-analysis could reveal that the incorporation of biomarkers in care bundles carried a significantly lower risk of MAKE when compared to care bundles without biomarkers (OR = 0.693, 95% CI = 0.50-0.96), while the usual care subgroup had a significantly higher risk (OR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.09-1.52). CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis demonstrated that care bundles decreased the risk of MAKE, moderate-severe AKI and need for RRT in AKI patients. Moreover, the inclusion of biomarkers in care bundles had a greater impact than care bundles without biomarkers.

Seasonal Change in Home Blood Pressure Monitoring Is Associated With Renal Outcome and Mortality in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease.

Background: Blood pressure (BP) variation may result in poor cardiovascular and renal outcomes. We investigated the pattern of seasonal BP change and its association with outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) living in southern Taiwan. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospective observational cohort consisting of outpatients with CKD for the period between December 2014 and December 2019. These patients were grouped according to the pattern of seasonal BP variation, namely, consistently higher average systolic BP (≥8 mmHg) in wintertime than summertime (Group A), consistently lower average systolic BP (≥8 mmHg) in wintertime than summertime (Group B), large variation of average systolic BP (≥8 mmHg) without a specific pattern related to weather (Group C), and little fluctuation of average systolic BP (<8 mmHg) throughout the years (Group D). The study endpoints were ≥40% reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), end stage renal disease (initiation of dialysis or transplantation), or death. Results: We analyzed 507 eligible patients, of whom 17.2% exhibited consistent BP elevation in the wintertime. There were 56.8% of patients conducting regular home BP monitoring. Cox regression analysis showed home BP monitoring was independently associated with better outcome in 507 CKD patients (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.56-0.94, P = 0.0162). Compared with the other three groups, patients with BP elevation in the wintertime (Group A) were older, had a higher prevalence of diabetic nephropathy and nephrotoxic agent use, a lower prevalence of statin use, higher eGFR decline rate, and a worse outcome. Patients with BP reduction in the wintertime (Group B) were associated with the best outcome. Cox regression analysis indicated that consistent BP elevation in the wintertime in 288 CKD patients with home BP monitoring was significantly associated with a worse composite outcome (i.e., ≥40% reduction in eGFR, end stage renal disease, or death) after adjustment for various confounding factors. Conclusion: Home BP monitoring is crucial, and associated with better outcome in CKD patients. Consistent home BP elevation from summertime to wintertime in patients with CKD was associated with a poorer composite outcome.